In the event someone is like 'Why is it a dumb implementation?' If players have to ask where, how, or when to use the DLC then its not implemented well. To me it would be more priority to fix that than another DLC. I hope they improve that with this next update/DLC but I don't see it as likely. At least Kestrel Lancers campaign missions were worth the ridiculous implementation. They implemented their DLC in such a dumb way that players have to do research to figure it out. So if Rise of Raselhague will be out of the campaign, or start before 3025, then I need to stop playing now, because I will simply not have the will to start a fourth campaign playthrough just to play ROR.Īlso, as I bought CTA, all my mods become obsolete.Ĭan you PLEASE include some mods in an upcoming patch, or at least add some features like advanced zoom module, and NavidA1's 3D hud?Īlso, if previous DLCs are not playable directly from the campaign, you need to make it so that all past, present and future DLCs can be played from the campaign.Ĭan you absolutely confirm this? I'm hitting 3020 in my campaign, so this is kinda important, only 5 years or so left before campaign hits Call to Arms.Ĭall to Arms doesn't have a story arc so I don't have that one but it should be in there. I'm asking because I just started a brand new campaign with the intent of playing up to 3025, and then either playing the DLCs within the campaign, or exporting my progress into Call to Arms career mode and then proceeding into Kestrel. What year is Rise of Rasalhague projected to start? Sarna says Rasalhague republic began in 3034? So does that mean that if that is the starting date for the upcoming DLC, you can technically play it after CTA and LOTKL?Īlso, is it possible to get the DLC missions for CTA, LOTKL And the upcoming ROR DLCs while playing the campaign and not just career? So I just finally bought Call to Arms DLC, and I see that the DLC missions begin at 3025 for call to arms and 3026 for Legend of the Kestrel Lancers.

Free download mw5 call to arms